EyesOnAssets
How Analytics Works
What a setup score is built from, and why historical accuracy isn't always shown.
From factors to a score
Every asset is checked against a set of technical factors (trend, momentum, volatility, volume) separately on several timeframes — from lower to higher.
Each timeframe's weight depends on the selected trading style: scalping leans on the 5-minute and 15-minute charts, position trading leans on daily and weekly. Each factor within a timeframe also carries its own weight.
The more independent factors and timeframes point the same direction (confluence), the higher the resulting score — and the more visible that is on the asset card, rather than relying on a single indicator.
The weighted sum is normalized to a scale and mapped to a verdict:
Historical accuracy — with a confidence interval
For every verdict (and separately for every factor), EyesOnAssets tracks statistics: how often a similar signal played out in the stated direction in the past. This isn't a backtest against one historical trade — it's cumulative live statistics, asset by asset, day by day.
Win rate is shown together with a 95% Wilson confidence interval, not as a bare number — a narrow range means the statistic is reliable, a wide one means the sample is still thin and the number deserves less trust. If there aren't enough observations yet for statistical significance, the win rate isn't shown at all, rather than displaying an uninformative figure.
The actionable block: levels and invalidation
Every verdict comes with more than a direction — key price levels, a scenario, and an invalidation condition: the price at which the setup is considered off. That turns an abstract score into a checkable plan, not just a "signal."
Analytics is an analytical tool based on historical technical data, not individualized investment advice. Historical accuracy does not guarantee future results. EyesOnAssets is not an investment advisor; trading decisions and their risks are the user's own responsibility.